

Romney may be the only person in human existence who laughs by emitting an unsettling “HA HA HA.” His efforts to ingratiate himself with his audiences -"I love cars”, “the trees are the right height” -reek of performance anxiety, a fear of spontaneity. Who can forget McCain, in the midst of one debate, scornfully pointing a figure at Obama and calling him “that one”?Īnd it’s apparent this year that Obama is clearly more Bugs, and Mitt Romney more Daffy. Clinton and McCain took on the role of Daffy. Think JFK-Nixon, Reagan-Carter, Clinton-Bush I, Bush II-Gore, Bush II-Kerry.įour years ago, in his primary battle against Hillary Clinton and in the general election contest against John McCain, Barack Obama was clearly Bugs.
#NO BUGS BUNNY MEME SKIN#
The Bugs-Daffy frame is another way of saying that ever since the dawn of television put the public personalities of candidates front and center, the one who is more comfortable in his or her own skin always prevails against the more uptight, rigid foe. Daffy is constantly frustrated, sometimes by outside forces, sometimes by his own overwrought response to them.” His response to bad news is a sibilant sneer (‘Thanks for the sour persimmons, cousin!’). He fumes, he clenches his fists, his eyes bulge, and his entire body tenses with fury. Daffy Duck, by contrast, is ever at war with a hostile world. “Bugs is at ease, laid back, secure, confident.
#NO BUGS BUNNY MEME HOW TO#
legend Chuck Jones, “Bugs and Daffy represent polar opposites in how to deal with the world,” I argued. It is highly possible that this is the year that Bugs Bunny loses.īack in 2008, I presented to an anxiously waiting world a Meta Theory of Recent Presidential Elections, encapsulated by the idea that “ Bugs Bunny always beats Daffy Duck.”Īs drawn by the Warner Bros. For me, this election threatens to invalidate my most enduring -make that my only enduring -contribution to American political discourse. But for me, that’s not what’s really at stake. What’s really at stake this November? The stark difference between the economic philosophies of Barack Obama and Mitt Romney? The choice between a headlong plunge into job-killing socialism and an enshrinement of heartless, predatory greed? The makeup of the Supreme Court for the next generation?
